PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core i5-4200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core i5-4200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $172 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 320.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.5 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of PGA946 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,782 vs 2,809).

Core i5-4200M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 52.5 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on PGA946, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4200M better than Celeron G6900TE?

Yes. Core i5-4200M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4200M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4200M is still the faster CPU overall, but Celeron G6900TE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-4200M comes in 324.5% more expensive on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G6900TE is also 320.4% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 12.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Celeron G6900TE can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of PGA946, and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core i5-4200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4200M

The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4200M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-4200M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G6900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-4200M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the Core i5-4200M's 2,809 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-4200M. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900TE vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4200M.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core i5-4200M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.1 GHz+29%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,782	2,809
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,457	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-4200M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900TE versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200M — the Celeron G6900TE supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900TE supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900TE) vs 16 (Core i5-4200M) — the Celeron G6900TE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core i5-4200M
Socket	LGA1700	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+200%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+300%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G6900TE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900TE) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4200M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget, Core i5-4200M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core i5-4200M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 710	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900TE was priced at $53, while the Core i5-4200M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($53 vs $225), Celeron G6900TE was $172 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900TE delivers 52.5 pts/$ vs 12.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-4200M — making the Celeron G6900TE the 123.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core i5-4200M
MSRP	$53-76%	$225
Performance per Dollar	52.5+320%	12.5
Release Date	2022	2013

Search Celeron G6900TE on Amazon

Search Core i5-4200M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.