PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core 2 Duo P8700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core 2 Duo P8700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $188 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
✅Delivers 351.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.5 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of PGA478 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,782 vs 2,805).
❌1066.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo P8700

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 35W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 52.5 PassMark/$ ($241 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on PGA478, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo P8700 better than Celeron G6900TE?

Yes. Core 2 Duo P8700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo P8700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P8700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo P8700 is still the faster CPU overall, but Celeron G6900TE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core 2 Duo P8700 comes in 354.7% more expensive on MSRP at $241 MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G6900TE is also 351.0% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Celeron G6900TE can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2009), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of PGA478, and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core 2 Duo P8700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo P8700

The Core 2 Duo P8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $209.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G6900TE and Core 2 Duo P8700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8700 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P8700 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Celeron G6900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the Core 2 Duo P8700's 2,805 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8700. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900TE vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8700.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core 2 Duo P8700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.53 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.53 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	3 MB+140%
Process	10 nm-78%	45 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,782	2,805
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,457	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900TE versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8700 — the Celeron G6900TE supports 350.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900TE supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900TE) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo P8700) — the Celeron G6900TE offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900TE) and GM45,GS45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo P8700).

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core 2 Duo P8700
Socket	LGA1700	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+355%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+350%	1066
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+1500%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G6900TE) vs true (Core 2 Duo P8700). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T; Core 2 Duo P8700 rivals Turion II Ultra M600.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core 2 Duo P8700
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 710	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900TE was priced at $53, while the Core 2 Duo P8700 came in at $241. On launch pricing ($53 vs $241), Celeron G6900TE was $188 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900TE delivers 52.5 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo P8700 — making the Celeron G6900TE the 127.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP	$53-78%	$241
Performance per Dollar	52.5+353%	11.6
Release Date	2022	2009

Search Celeron G6900TE on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo P8700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.