Celeron G6900TE vs Core i7-5550U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core i7-5550U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core i7-5550U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1168 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while Core i7-5550U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Core i7-5550U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-5550U

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,780 vs 2,782).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1168, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900TE better than Core i7-5550U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-5550U is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900TE pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $53 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-5550U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2015), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1168, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core i7-5550U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-5550U

The Core i7-5550U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,780 points. Launch price was $426.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-5550U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-5550U — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-5550U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G6900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-5550U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the Core i7-5550U's 2,780 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G6900TE. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core i7-5550U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark	2,782	2,780
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,457	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-5550U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core i7-5550U
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900TE) / not specified (Core i7-5550U). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Core i7-5550U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.