Celeron G6900TE vs Celeron J4105

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900TE vs Celeron J4105 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900TE vs Celeron J4105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900TE

2022

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1090 and DDR4.
✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,782 vs 2,820).
❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Celeron J4105 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Celeron J4105

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older platform position on FCBGA1090 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4105 better than Celeron G6900TE?

Yes. Celeron J4105 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron J4105 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J4105 is still the faster CPU overall, but Celeron G6900TE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Celeron J4105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G6900TE is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1090. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900TE vs Celeron J4105 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron J4105

The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J4105 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J4105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Celeron J4105 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Celeron G6900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron J4105 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the Celeron J4105's 2,820 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron J4105. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900TE vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4105.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Celeron J4105
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+60%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	4 MB (total)+220%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Goldmont Plus (2017)
PassMark	2,782	2,820+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,457	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Celeron J4105 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900TE versus 2400 on the Celeron J4105 — the Celeron G6900TE supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900TE supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900TE) vs 6 (Celeron J4105) — the Celeron G6900TE offers 14 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900TE) and BGA1090 (Celeron J4105).

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Celeron J4105
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+100%	2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+1500%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20+233%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G6900TE) vs true (Celeron J4105). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900TE) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4105) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T; Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.