Celeron G6900TE
VS
FX-8800P

Celeron G6900TE vs FX-8800P

Intel

Celeron G6900TE

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2022
VS
AMD

FX-8800P

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900TE

#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
108%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
108%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
107%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
106%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
104%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
104%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
103%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
103%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
103%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
103%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
102%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
102%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
102%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
101%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
101%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
100%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
99%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
99%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
99%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
98%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
95%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
95%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
90%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
90%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
88%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
86%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
84%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
82%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
79%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
79%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8800P

#891
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1553%
#892
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1530%
#893
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1405%
#894
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1399%
#895
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1386%
#897
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1338%
#898
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1283%
#899
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1281%
#900
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1247%
#903
FX-8800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#905
Core i7-8809G
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
99%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G6900TE (2022) utilizes 10 nm technology and **DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G6900TEFX-8800P
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($64)
More affordable ($45)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8800P (2015) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G6900TEFX-8800P
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+45%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($64)
More affordable ($45)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G6900TE and FX-8800P

Intel

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FX-8800P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE versus 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P — a 34.5% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron G6900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the FX-8800P uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the FX-8800P's 2,833 — a 1.8% lead for the FX-8800P.

FeatureCeleron G6900TEFX-8800P
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz+42%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+14%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2048 kB+60%
Process
10 nm-64%
28 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark
2,782
2,833+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,400
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,457
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the FX-8800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G6900TEFX-8800P
Socket
LGA1700
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900TE) / not specified (FX-8800P). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the FX-8800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

FeatureCeleron G6900TEFX-8800P
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 710
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G6900TE launched at $53 MSRP, while the FX-8800P debuted at $150. At current prices ($64 vs $45), the FX-8800P is $19 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900TE delivers 43.5 pts/$ vs 63.0 pts/$ for the FX-8800P — making the FX-8800P the 36.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G6900TEFX-8800P
MSRP
$53-65%
$150
Avg Price (30d)
$64
$45-30%
Performance per Dollar
43.5
63.0+45%
Release Date
2022
2015