Celeron G6900TE vs FX-8800P

Celeron G6900TE vs FX-8800P Performance Spectrum

Celeron G6900TE

2 / 2

2,782

0.0%

2,833

+1.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900TE vs FX-8800P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900TE vs FX-8800P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900TE

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $97 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 177.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.5 vs 18.9 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP4 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while FX-8800P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8800P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,782 vs 2,833).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

FX-8800P

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.9 vs 52.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FP4, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8800P better than Celeron G6900TE?

Yes. FX-8800P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8800P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8800P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8800P is still the faster CPU overall, but Celeron G6900TE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. FX-8800P comes in 183.0% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G6900TE is also 177.9% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 18.9 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2015) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900TE vs FX-8800P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FX-8800P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8800P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE versus 3.4 GHz on the FX-8800P — a 34.5% clock advantage for the FX-8800P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron G6900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the FX-8800P uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the FX-8800P's 2,833 — a 1.8% lead for the FX-8800P.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	FX-8800P
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.4 GHz+42%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2048 kB+60%
Process	10 nm-64%	28 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,782	2,833+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,457	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the FX-8800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	FX-8800P
Socket	LGA1700	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900TE) / not specified (FX-8800P). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the FX-8800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	FX-8800P
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900TE was priced at $53, while the FX-8800P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($53 vs $150), Celeron G6900TE was $97 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900TE delivers 52.5 pts/$ vs 18.9 pts/$ for the FX-8800P — making the Celeron G6900TE the 94.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	FX-8800P
MSRP	$53-65%	$150
Performance per Dollar	52.5+178%	18.9
Release Date	2022	2015

Search Celeron G6900TE on Amazon

Search FX-8800P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.