Core Ultra 5 115U vs Xeon E-2276M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 115U vs Xeon E-2276M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 115U vs Xeon E-2276M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 115U

2023

Why buy it

✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2276M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,518 vs 11,654).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2276M, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon E-2276M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $939 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 115U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 115U moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2276M better than Core Ultra 5 115U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2276M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 115U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2276M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2276M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2276M is the better buy right now. Xeon E-2276M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $939 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 115U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 115U vs Xeon E-2276M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 115U

The Core Ultra 5 115U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 10 MB. Memory support: DDR5 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 11,518 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E-2276M

The Xeon E-2276M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,654 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 115U packs 8 cores / 10 threads, while the Xeon E-2276M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 5 115U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 115U versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon E-2276M — a 11.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2276M (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 115U uses the Meteor Lake (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E-2276M uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 115U scores 11,518 against the Xeon E-2276M's 11,654 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon E-2276M. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 115U vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2276M.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 115U	Xeon E-2276M
Cores / Threads	8 / 10+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz	4.7 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+87%
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Meteor Lake (2023)	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
PassMark	11,518	11,654+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 115U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2276M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.