Core Ultra 5 225
Ryzen 7 8700F
Core Ultra 5 225 vs Ryzen 7 8700F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 225 vs Ryzen 7 8700F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 225 vs Ryzen 7 8700F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 225
2025Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.7 vs 115.7 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $270 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores), while Ryzen 7 8700F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,020 vs 18,040).
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 115.7 vs 129.7 PassMark/$ ($270 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8700F better than Core Ultra 5 225?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 225 vs Ryzen 7 8700F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 5 225
The Core Ultra 5 225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,137 points. Launch price was $246.
Ryzen 7 8700F
The Ryzen 7 8700F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,240 points. Launch price was $270.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225 packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8700F offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700F — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F (base: 3.3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8700F uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225 scores 31,137 against the Ryzen 7 8700F's 31,240 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,020 vs 18,040 (5.8% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,653 vs 2,649, a 0.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,028 vs 13,500 (3.6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700F). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700F.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 31,137 | 31,240 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,020 | 18,040+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,653 | 2,649 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,028 | 13,500+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8700F uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8700F — the Core Ultra 5 225 supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 5 225) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 8700F) — the Core Ultra 5 225 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 5 225) and XB650,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700F).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+23% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 8700F has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 8700F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 225) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8700F). The Core Ultra 5 225 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores)), while the Ryzen 7 8700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225 targets Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency, Ryzen 7 8700F targets High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G; Ryzen 7 8700F rivals Core i7-14700F.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency | High-performance Gaming w/ dGPU |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 5 225 was priced at $240, while the Ryzen 7 8700F came in at $270. On launch pricing ($240 vs $270), Core Ultra 5 225 was $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 225 delivers 129.7 pts/$ vs 115.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 8700F — making the Core Ultra 5 225 the 11.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225 | Ryzen 7 8700F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $240-11% | $270 |
| Performance per Dollar | 129.7+12% | 115.7 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 5 225 and Ryzen 7 8700F
