Core i5-1135G7 vs Core Ultra 5 235H

Intel

Core i5-1135G7

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

14 Cores14 Thrd20 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-1135G7

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 20W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,183 vs 17,607).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
  • Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 235H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.

Core Ultra 5 235H

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +95.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
  • 75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 33.3% higher power demand at 20W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 235H better than Core i5-1135G7?
Yes. Core Ultra 5 235H is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 95.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 239.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 216.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 235H is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 95.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 235H is the better fit. You are getting 239.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 5 235H still looks like the safer overall buy. Core Ultra 5 235H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 95.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 235H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA2049 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1449, 125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 4/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-1135G7Core Ultra 5 235H
1080p
low168 FPS299 FPS
medium137 FPS262 FPS
high107 FPS218 FPS
ultra85 FPS187 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS245 FPS
medium118 FPS193 FPS
high91 FPS157 FPS
ultra72 FPS138 FPS
4K
low68 FPS168 FPS
medium59 FPS134 FPS
high46 FPS104 FPS
ultra36 FPS90 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-1135G7Core Ultra 5 235H
1080p
low153 FPS746 FPS
medium129 FPS625 FPS
high118 FPS499 FPS
ultra102 FPS440 FPS
1440p
low135 FPS704 FPS
medium115 FPS566 FPS
high107 FPS453 FPS
ultra92 FPS379 FPS
4K
low106 FPS415 FPS
medium93 FPS339 FPS
high80 FPS311 FPS
ultra67 FPS268 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-1135G7Core Ultra 5 235H
1080p
low235 FPS746 FPS
medium235 FPS746 FPS
high235 FPS746 FPS
ultra235 FPS653 FPS
1440p
low235 FPS746 FPS
medium235 FPS721 FPS
high235 FPS624 FPS
ultra235 FPS537 FPS
4K
low235 FPS628 FPS
medium235 FPS519 FPS
high235 FPS458 FPS
ultra235 FPS383 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-1135G7Core Ultra 5 235H
1080p
low235 FPS746 FPS
medium235 FPS746 FPS
high235 FPS746 FPS
ultra235 FPS741 FPS
1440p
low235 FPS746 FPS
medium235 FPS746 FPS
high235 FPS677 FPS
ultra235 FPS579 FPS
4K
low235 FPS604 FPS
medium235 FPS538 FPS
high235 FPS486 FPS
ultra235 FPS423 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1135G7 and Core Ultra 5 235H

Intel

Core i5-1135G7

The Core i5-1135G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,414 points. Launch price was $309.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.

Processing Power

The Core i5-1135G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 235H has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1135G7 versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H (base: 1.5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i5-1135G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1135G7 scores 9,414 against the Core Ultra 5 235H's 29,820 — a 104% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 5,183 vs 17,607 (109% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,592 vs 2,693, a 51.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,495 vs 14,040 (103% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1135G7 vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H.

FeatureCore i5-1135G7Core Ultra 5 235H
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
14 / 14+250%
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz
5 GHz+19%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
4.4 GHz+193%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
18 MB+125%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm SuperFin
5 nm-50%
Architecture
Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
9,414
29,820+217%
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,183
17,607+240%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,592
2,693+69%
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,495
14,040+212%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1135G7 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i5-1135G7 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235H — the Core Ultra 5 235H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 235H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-1135G7) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) — the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-1135G7) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H).

FeatureCore i5-1135G7Core Ultra 5 235H
Socket
FCBGA1449
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
192 GB+200%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
28+75%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 5 235H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i5-1135G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU) (Core i5-1135G7) and Intel Arc 140T Graphics (Core Ultra 5 235H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1135G7 targets Productivity, Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1135G7 rivals Ryzen 5 5500U; Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.

FeatureCore i5-1135G7Core Ultra 5 235H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)
Intel Arc 140T Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Productivity
Thin-and-light Performance Laptop