
Core i5-1135G7
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 235H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1135G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 20W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,183 vs 17,607).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 235H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 235H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +95.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 20W vs 15W.
Core i5-1135G7
2020Core Ultra 5 235H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 20W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +95.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,183 vs 17,607).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 235H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 20W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 235H better than Core i5-1135G7?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1135G7 | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1135G7 | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 379 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 415 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 268 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1135G7 | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 746 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 653 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 721 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 383 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1135G7 | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 746 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 741 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1135G7 and Core Ultra 5 235H

Core i5-1135G7
Core i5-1135G7
The Core i5-1135G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,414 points. Launch price was $309.

Core Ultra 5 235H
Core Ultra 5 235H
The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1135G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 5 235H has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1135G7 versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H (base: 1.5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i5-1135G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1135G7 scores 9,414 against the Core Ultra 5 235H's 29,820 — a 104% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 5,183 vs 17,607 (109% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,592 vs 2,693, a 51.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,495 vs 14,040 (103% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1135G7 vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H.
| Feature | Core i5-1135G7 | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 14 / 14+250% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz | 5 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz+193% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 18 MB+125% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 5 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) | Arrow Lake-H (2025) |
| PassMark | 9,414 | 29,820+217% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,183 | 17,607+240% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,592 | 2,693+69% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,495 | 14,040+212% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1135G7 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i5-1135G7 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235H — the Core Ultra 5 235H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 235H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-1135G7) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) — the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-1135G7) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H).
| Feature | Core i5-1135G7 | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 192 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 235H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i5-1135G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU) (Core i5-1135G7) and Intel Arc 140T Graphics (Core Ultra 5 235H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1135G7 targets Productivity, Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1135G7 rivals Ryzen 5 5500U; Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.
| Feature | Core i5-1135G7 | Core Ultra 5 235H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU) | Intel Arc 140T Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Productivity | Thin-and-light Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












