
Atom x7809C vs Core i5-1135G7

Atom x7809C

Core i5-1135G7
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7809C is positioned at rank 61 and the Core i5-1135G7 is on rank 688, so the Atom x7809C offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7809C
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-1135G7
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom x7809C | Core i5-1135G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom x7809C | Core i5-1135G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7809C and Core i5-1135G7

Atom x7809C
The Atom x7809C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,409 points. Launch price was $117.

Core i5-1135G7
The Core i5-1135G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,414 points. Launch price was $309.
Processing Power
The Atom x7809C packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-1135G7 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom x7809C has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7809C versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-1135G7 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-1135G7 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Atom x7809C uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-1135G7 uses Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Atom x7809C scores 9,409 against the Core i5-1135G7's 9,414 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-1135G7. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,102 vs 1,592, a 36.4% lead for the Core i5-1135G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,657 vs 4,495 (3.5% advantage for the Atom x7809C). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7809C vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1135G7.
| Feature | Atom x7809C | Core i5-1135G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+33% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) |
| PassMark | 9,409 | 9,414 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 5,183 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,102 | 1,592+44% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,657+4% | 4,495 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7809C uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-1135G7 uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7809C versus DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i5-1135G7 — the Atom x7809C supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-1135G7 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7809C) vs 2 (Core i5-1135G7). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7809C) vs 16 (Core i5-1135G7) — the Core i5-1135G7 offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1264 (Atom x7809C) and SoC (Core i5-1135G7).
| Feature | Atom x7809C | Core i5-1135G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | FCBGA1449 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 16+78% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i5-1135G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7809C) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1135G7). The Core i5-1135G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Atom x7809C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1135G7 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-1135G7 rivals Ryzen 5 5500U.
| Feature | Atom x7809C | Core i5-1135G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















