Atom x7809C
VS
Ryzen 5 2500X

Atom x7809C vs Ryzen 5 2500X

Intel

Atom x7809C

8 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 2500X

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom x7809C is positioned at rank #61 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7809C

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
99%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#49
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
218%
#50
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
215%
#51
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
197%
#52
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
197%
#53
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
195%
#55
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
188%
#56
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
180%
#57
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
180%
#58
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
175%
#61
Atom x7809C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
98%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
96%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 2500X

#124
Core Ultra 9 285K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
105%
#125
Core i5-13400E
MSRP: $221|Avg: $221
104%
#126
Ryzen 7 8700F
MSRP: $270|Avg: $257
104%
#127
Core i9-14900KF
MSRP: $564|Avg: $480
104%
#128
Core i7-12700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $285
103%
#129
Core i9-13900KF
MSRP: $599|Avg: $480
103%
#130
Core i7-12700
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
102%
#131
Core Ultra 5 245T
MSRP: $270|Avg: $270
102%
#132
Core i5-8500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $80
101%
#133
Core i5-9400F
MSRP: $182|Avg: $80
101%
#134
Core i5-11400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $141
101%
#135
Core i5-13600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $319
101%
#136
Core i5-13500
MSRP: $242|Avg: $264
100%
#137
Ryzen 7 8700G
MSRP: $329|Avg: $269
100%
#138
Core i7-14700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $348
100%
#139
Ryzen 5 2500X
MSRP: $159|Avg: $80
100%
#140
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
100%
#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
99%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
98%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
98%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
98%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
98%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
96%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
96%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
96%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
96%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
96%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
96%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
95%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7809C (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom x7809CRyzen 5 2500X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen+ (2018−2019) / 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 2500X (2018) relies on 12 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom x7809CRyzen 5 2500X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7809C and Ryzen 5 2500X

Intel

Atom x7809C

The Atom x7809C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,409 points. Launch price was $117.

AMD

Ryzen 5 2500X

The Ryzen 5 2500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 9,388 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Atom x7809C packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2500X offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom x7809C has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7809C versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2500X — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2500X (base: 2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Atom x7809C uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2500X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7809C scores 9,409 against the Ryzen 5 2500X's 9,388 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom x7809C. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7809C vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2500X.

FeatureAtom x7809CRyzen 5 2500X
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.6 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per module)+300%
512K (per core)
Process
10 nm-17%
12 nm
Architecture
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
9,409
9,388
Geekbench 6 Single
1,102
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7809C uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 2500X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom x7809CRyzen 5 2500X
Socket
FCBGA1264
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7809C) / not specified (Ryzen 5 2500X).

FeatureAtom x7809CRyzen 5 2500X
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d