
Core Ultra 5 235U

M1 Pro
Core Ultra 5 235U vs M1 Pro Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 235U vs M1 Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 235U vs M1 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 235U
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 14W instead of 28W, a 14W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
M1 Pro
2021Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 235U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,218 vs 17,397).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 28W vs 14W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 235U better than M1 Pro?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 235U vs M1 Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 235U
The Core Ultra 5 235U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 14 MB + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,397 points. Launch price was $299.
M1 Pro
The M1 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 235U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the M1 Pro offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core Ultra 5 235U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235U versus 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro — a 41.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.064 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 235U is built on the Arrow Lake-U (2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235U scores 17,397 against the M1 Pro's 17,218 — a 1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235U. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235U vs 24 MB on the M1 Pro.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235U | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+20% | 10 / 10 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+52% | 3.22 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+16% | 2.064 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 24 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | — | 28 MB |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-U (2025) | — |
| PassMark | 17,397+1% | 17,218 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 235U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M1 Pro uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 235U | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













