Core Ultra 5 238V vs EPYC 4124P

Core Ultra 5 238V vs EPYC 4124P Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 5 238V

8 / 8

18,219

+0.4%

18,139

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 238V vs EPYC 4124P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 238V vs EPYC 4124P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 238V

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4124P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,000 vs 10,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4124P, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $454 MSRP, while EPYC 4124P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 4124P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 8.
✅250% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4124P better than Core Ultra 5 238V?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4124P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 238V is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4124P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4124P is the stronger fit. You are getting 5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4124P is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. EPYC 4124P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $454 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Ultra 5 238V only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 14.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4124P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB), more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Ultra 5 238V vs EPYC 4124P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 238V

The Core Ultra 5 238V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,219 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 4124P

The EPYC 4124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,139 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 238V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the EPYC 4124P offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 5 238V has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 238V versus 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4124P — a 8.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 4124P (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 238V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 4124P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 238V scores 18,219 against the EPYC 4124P's 18,139 — a 0.4% lead for the Core Ultra 5 238V. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 10,000 vs 10,500 (4.9% advantage for the EPYC 4124P). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,683 vs 1,962, a 31% lead for the Core Ultra 5 238V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,130 vs 1,898 (136.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 238V). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 238V vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4124P.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 238V	EPYC 4124P
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz	5.1 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+81%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)+150%	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-40%	5 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	18,219	18,139
Cinebench R23 Multi	10,000	10,500+5%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,683+37%	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,130+434%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 238V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4124P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8533 on the Core Ultra 5 238V versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4124P — the Core Ultra 5 238V supports 64.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4124P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 5 238V) vs 28 (EPYC 4124P) — the EPYC 4124P offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 5 238V) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4124P).

Feature	Core Ultra 5 238V	EPYC 4124P
Socket	FCBGA2833	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8533+64%	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	192 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	28+250%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4124P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 238V) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4124P). Both include integrated graphics — Arc Graphics 130V (Core Ultra 5 238V) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4124P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 238V targets Productivity, EPYC 4124P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 238V rivals Ryzen 5 8640U; EPYC 4124P rivals Core i5-10500T.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 238V	EPYC 4124P
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Arc Graphics 130V	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use	Productivity	Entry Server