
Core Ultra 5 238V

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
Core Ultra 5 238V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 238V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 238V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 238V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 130V, while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,219 vs 18,409).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.1 vs 59.6 PassMark/$ ($454 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $145 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $454 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 48.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.6 vs 40.1 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $454 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 238V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 238V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 238V better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 238V vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 238V
The Core Ultra 5 238V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,219 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,409 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 238V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 238V versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE — a 8.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 238V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 238V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 238V scores 18,219 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE's 18,409 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 238V vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+9% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+400% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 18,219 | 18,409+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,683 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,130 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 238V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 238V) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE). The Core Ultra 5 238V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 130V), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 238V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 238V rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics 130V | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 5 238V was priced at $454, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE came in at $309. On launch pricing ($454 vs $309), Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE was $145 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 238V delivers 40.1 pts/$ vs 59.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE the 39% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $454 | $309-32% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.1 | 59.6+49% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














