Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 7 255HX

20 / 20

49,765

+2.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

16 / 32

48,756

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 255HX

2025

Why buy it

✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 55W instead of 280W, a 225W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA2114 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (48,756 vs 49,765).
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌409.1% higher power demand at 280W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 255HX moves to FCBGA2114 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 255HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 255HX better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 7 255HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 7 255HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 7 255HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 7 255HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 20.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (61.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 7 255HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FCBGA2114 and DDR5 instead of sWRX8, and more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 20 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 255HX

The Core Ultra 7 255HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,765 points. Launch price was $450.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255HX packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core Ultra 7 255HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255HX versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — a 14.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 49,765 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 — a 2% lead for the Core Ultra 7 255HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 255HX vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.

Feature	Core Ultra 7 255HX	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Cores / Threads	20 / 20+25%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+16%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	4 GHz+67%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	64 MB+113%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+16967%
Process	3 nm-57%	7 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-HX (2025)	Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark	49,765+2%	48,756
Geekbench 6 Single	2,923	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	16,885	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255HX versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX — the Core Ultra 7 255HX supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel HM870,Intel WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).

Feature	Core Ultra 7 255HX	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Socket	FCBGA2114	sWRX8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400+100%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	128+433%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). The Core Ultra 7 255HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 255HX rivals Ryzen 9 9850HX; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.