
Core Ultra 7 255HX

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 7 255HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (49,765 vs 50,189).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 60 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $5,945 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 255HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 255HX better than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 7 255HX
The Core Ultra 7 255HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,765 points. Launch price was $450.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 255HX packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255HX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 23.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 49,765 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 255HX vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 32 / 64+60% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+27% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 60 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+50% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 49,765 | 50,189 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,923 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,885 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 255HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255HX versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — the Core Ultra 7 255HX supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel HM870,Intel WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+14% | 5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 255HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). The Core Ultra 7 255HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 255HX rivals Ryzen 9 9850HX; Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Xe-LPG | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














