Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255HX

20 Cores20 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2025
Core Ultra family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

32 Cores64 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 7 255HX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (49,765 vs 50,189).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 60 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
  • 233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 255HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $5,945 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 255HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 7 255HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 7 255HX better than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 7 255HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 30 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 7 255HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core Ultra 7 255HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $5,945 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 7 255HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 7 255HX vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 255HX

The Core Ultra 7 255HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,765 points. Launch price was $450.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 7 255HX packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 255HX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 23.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 255HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 255HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 255HX scores 49,765 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 255HX vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXXeon Platinum 8562Y+
Cores / Threads
20 / 20
32 / 64+60%
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+27%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
60 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+50%
2 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-70%
10 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
49,765
50,189
Geekbench 6 Single
2,923
Geekbench 6 Multi
16,885
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 7 255HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 255HX versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — the Core Ultra 7 255HX supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel HM870,Intel WM880 (Core Ultra 7 255HX) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXXeon Platinum 8562Y+
Socket
FCBGA2114
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400+14%
5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
80+233%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 7 255HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 7 255HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). The Core Ultra 7 255HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 255HX rivals Ryzen 9 9850HX; Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.

FeatureCore Ultra 7 255HXXeon Platinum 8562Y+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Xe-LPG
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d