Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Intel

Core Ultra 9 185H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023
Core Ultra family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 9 185H

2023

Why buy it

  • +15.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

2024

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,332 vs 2,700).
    • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 18,030).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 9 185H.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core Ultra 9 185H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS?
    Yes. Core Ultra 9 185H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 13.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 0.9% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 9 185H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 9 185H is the stronger fit. You are getting 13.2% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 22 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core Ultra 9 185H still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 9 185H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

    Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core Ultra 9 185H

    The Core Ultra 9 185H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,360 points. Launch price was $640.

    AMD

    Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

    The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.

    Processing Power

    The Core Ultra 9 185H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 185H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 185H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 185H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 185H scores 29,360 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS's 29,088 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Ultra 9 185H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,030 vs 15,930 (12.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 185H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 2,332, a 14.6% lead for the Core Ultra 9 185H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,000 vs 11,037 (42.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 185H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 185H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.

    FeatureCore Ultra 9 185HRyzen 7 PRO 8845HS
    Cores / Threads
    16 / 22+100%
    8 / 16
    Boost Clock
    5.1 GHz
    5.1 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.9 GHz+3%
    3.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    24 MB (total)+50%
    16 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per core)+100%
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    7 nm
    4 nm-43%
    Architecture
    Meteor Lake-H (2023)
    Hawk Point (2024−2025)
    PassMark
    29,360
    29,088
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    18,030+13%
    15,930
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,700+16%
    2,332
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    17,000+54%
    11,037
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core Ultra 9 185H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 on the Core Ultra 9 185H versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS — the Core Ultra 9 185H supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 9 185H) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) — the Core Ultra 9 185H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Meteor Lake SoC (Core Ultra 9 185H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS).

    FeatureCore Ultra 9 185HRyzen 7 PRO 8845HS
    Socket
    FCBGA2049
    FP7
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0+25%
    PCIe 4.0
    Max RAM Speed
    LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600+33%
    DDR5-5600
    Max RAM Capacity
    96 GB
    256 GB+167%
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    28+40%
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 185H) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 185H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 185H targets Mainstream Performance / AI Workloads, Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 185H rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS; Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.

    FeatureCore Ultra 9 185HRyzen 7 PRO 8845HS
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)
    Radeon 780M
    Unlocked
    No
    Yes
    AVX-512
    No
    Yes
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d, EPT
    AMD-V, SVM
    Target Use
    Mainstream Performance / AI Workloads
    Enterprise Performance Laptop