Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 9 7940H

Intel

Core Ultra 9 185H

16 Cores22 Thrd0 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023
Core Ultra family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 7940H

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Ryzen family
·······

Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 9 7940H Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 9 7940H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 9 7940H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 9 185H

2023

Why buy it

  • +4.8% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 9 7940H.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 9 7940H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 18,030).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 9 185H.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 185H better than Ryzen 9 7940H?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 9 7940H is ahead with a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 9 185H pulls ahead with 4.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core Ultra 9 185H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 9 185H is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 22 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 9 185H still makes the most sense overall. Core Ultra 9 185H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 4.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 185H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 22 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ryzen 9 7940H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 185H

The Core Ultra 9 185H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,360 points. Launch price was $640.

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940H

The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 185H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 185H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 185H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H (base: 3.9 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 185H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 185H scores 29,360 against the Ryzen 9 7940H's 29,151 — a 0.7% lead for the Core Ultra 9 185H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,030 vs 17,200 (4.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 185H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 2,646, a 2% lead for the Core Ultra 9 185H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,000 vs 13,495 (23% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 185H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 185H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 185HRyzen 9 7940H
Cores / Threads
16 / 22+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.9 GHz
4 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark
29,360
29,151
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,030+5%
17,200
Geekbench 6 Single
2,700+2%
2,646
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,000+26%
13,495
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 185H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 on the Core Ultra 9 185H versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940H — the Core Ultra 9 185H supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 7940H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 9 185H) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940H) — the Core Ultra 9 185H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Meteor Lake SoC (Core Ultra 9 185H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H).

FeatureCore Ultra 9 185HRyzen 9 7940H
Socket
FCBGA2049
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600+33%
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
256 GB+167%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28+40%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7940H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7940H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 185H) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 185H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 185H targets Mainstream Performance / AI Workloads, Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 185H rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS; Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 185HRyzen 9 7940H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores)
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V, SVM
Target Use
Mainstream Performance / AI Workloads
High-performance Gaming Laptop