Core Ultra 9 285 vs Core i5-13400F
Core Ultra 9 285
Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 285 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($550) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 285 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+33%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($550) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 285 and Core i5-13400F
Core Ultra 9 285
The Core Ultra 9 285 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 57,442 points. Launch price was $579.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285 packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285 scores 57,442 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 78.6% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 40,000 vs 16,211 (84.6% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,000 vs 2,407, a 21.9% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 11,408 (54.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24+140% | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+20% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+80% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+140% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 57,442+130% | 25,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,000+147% | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000+25% | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000+75% | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 285) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core Ultra 9 285 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 800 Series (Core Ultra 9 285) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: Yes (Core Ultra 9 285) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Core Ultra 9 285 includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285 targets High-End Gaming, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-End Gaming | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 9 285 launched at $589 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($550 vs $180), the Core i5-13400F is $370 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 285 delivers 104.4 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 28.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $589 | $196-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $180-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.4 | 139.1+33% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 285 and Core i5-13400F
