Core Ultra 9 285
Ryzen 9 5900X
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 9 285
2025Why buy it
- ✅+38% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Delivers 37.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 97.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($589 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌7.3% HIGHER MSRP$589 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,174 vs 3,000).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 40,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 9 285 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 285 better than Ryzen 9 5900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 9 285
The Core Ultra 9 285 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 57,442 points. Launch price was $579.
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285 packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 13.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285 scores 57,442 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 38.4% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 40,000 vs 21,000 (62.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,000 vs 2,174, a 31.9% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 11,888 (50.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24+100% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+15% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+16967% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 57,442+47% | 38,955 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,000+90% | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000+38% | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000+68% | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Core Ultra 9 285 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 800 Series (Core Ultra 9 285) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Core Ultra 9 285) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Core Ultra 9 285 includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285 targets High-End Gaming, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-End Gaming | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 9 285 was priced at $589, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($589 vs $549), Ryzen 9 5900X was $40 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 285 delivers 97.5 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Core Ultra 9 285 the 31.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $589 | $549-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 97.5+37% | 71.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 285 and Ryzen 9 5900X
