
Core Ultra 9 285 vs Xeon w7-2495X

Core Ultra 9 285

Xeon w7-2495X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-2495X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 285 | Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($550) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,900) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 285 | Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+430%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($550) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,900) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 285 and Xeon w7-2495X

Core Ultra 9 285
The Core Ultra 9 285 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 57,442 points. Launch price was $579.

Xeon w7-2495X
The Xeon w7-2495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 57,133 points. Launch price was $2,189.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285 packs 24 cores / 24 threads, matching the Xeon w7-2495X's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2495X — a 13.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon w7-2495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285 scores 57,442 against the Xeon w7-2495X's 57,133 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 40,000 vs 35,362 (12.3% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,000 vs 2,394, a 22.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 20,000 vs 16,891 (16.9% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285 vs 45 MB on the Xeon w7-2495X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+15% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 45 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+50% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 57,442 | 57,133 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,000+13% | 35,362 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000+25% | 2,394 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000+18% | 16,891 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w7-2495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon w7-2495X supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 285) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2495X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 285) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2495X) — the Xeon w7-2495X offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 800 Series (Core Ultra 9 285) and W790 (Xeon w7-2495X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-2495X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w7-2495X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core Ultra 9 285) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-2495X). The Core Ultra 9 285 includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics), while the Xeon w7-2495X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285 targets High-End Gaming, Xeon w7-2495X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon w7-2495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-End Gaming | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 9 285 launched at $589 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-2495X debuted at $2189. At current prices ($550 vs $2900), the Core Ultra 9 285 is $2350 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 285 delivers 104.4 pts/$ vs 19.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2495X — making the Core Ultra 9 285 the 136.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285 | Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $589-73% | $2189 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550-81% | $2900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 104.4+430% | 19.7 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















