Core Ultra 9 285HX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 9 285HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 350W, a 295W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (3,020 vs 3,106).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (21,079 vs 22,200).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,899 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 285HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌536.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 285HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 285HX better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 285HX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 9 285HX
The Core Ultra 9 285HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,732 points. Launch price was $650.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,054 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285HX packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285HX versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — a 3.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285HX (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285HX uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285HX scores 58,732 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX's 60,054 — a 2.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,106 vs 3,020, a 2.8% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,200 vs 21,079 (5.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285HX). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285HX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+4% | 5.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz+61% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 58,732 | 60,054+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 36,742 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,106+3% | 3,020 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,200+5% | 21,079 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285HX versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX — the Core Ultra 9 285HX supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 285HX) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 285HX) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel HM870 (Core Ultra 9 285HX) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+23% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 1024 GB+433% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. The Core Ultra 9 285HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX3D; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX rivals Xeon w7-2495X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285HX | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 285HX and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
