Core Ultra 9 285T
Ryzen 5 5600
Core Ultra 9 285T vs Ryzen 5 5600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 9 285T vs Ryzen 5 5600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 9 285T vs Ryzen 5 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 9 285T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 67.2 vs 108.3 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 108.3 vs 67.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core Ultra 9 285T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 285T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,550 vs 36,916).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 9 285T moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 285T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 285T better than Ryzen 5 5600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 285T vs Ryzen 5 5600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 9 285T
The Core Ultra 9 285T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 36,916 points. Launch price was $549.
Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285T packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285T has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285T versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285T (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285T scores 36,916 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 52.6% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285T. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285T vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285T | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+23% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+150% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total)+13% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+16967% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 36,916+71% | 21,550 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the Core Ultra 9 285T supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 9 285T) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 9 285T) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285T | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 285T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). The Core Ultra 9 285T includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285T rivals Ryzen 9 7900.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285T | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 9 285T was priced at $549, while the Ryzen 5 5600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($549 vs $199), Ryzen 5 5600 was $350 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 285T delivers 67.2 pts/$ vs 108.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600 — making the Ryzen 5 5600 the 46.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285T | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $199-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.2 | 108.3+61% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 285T and Ryzen 5 5600
