Core i7-14700HX vs Core Ultra 9 285T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-14700HX vs Core Ultra 9 285T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-14700HX vs Core Ultra 9 285T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-14700HX

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 285T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.

Core Ultra 9 285T

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (36,916 vs 37,173).
❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while Core i7-14700HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 285T better than Core i7-14700HX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core Ultra 9 285T is ahead with a 16.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700HX pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 9 285T is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 9 285T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $549 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i7-14700HX is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (67.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 9 285T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-14700HX vs Core Ultra 9 285T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-14700HX

The Core i7-14700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,173 points. Launch price was $499.

Core Ultra 9 285T

The Core Ultra 9 285T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 36,916 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-14700HX packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285T offers 24 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14700HX versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285T — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Core i7-14700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700HX scores 37,173 against the Core Ultra 9 285T's 36,916 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-14700HX. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700HX vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285T.

Feature	Core i7-14700HX	Core Ultra 9 285T
Cores / Threads	20 / 28	24 / 24+20%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz	5.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+50%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)	36 MB (total)+9%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	3 MB (per core)+50%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark	37,173	36,916
Geekbench 6 Single	2,871	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,358	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-14700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700HX versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285T — the Core Ultra 9 285T supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-14700HX) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 9 285T).

Feature	Core i7-14700HX	Core Ultra 9 285T
Socket	FCBGA1964	LGA1851
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	256 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-14700HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-14700HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (Core i7-14700HX) and Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics (Core Ultra 9 285T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285T rivals Ryzen 9 7900.