EPYC 7261
VS
Core 7 160UL

EPYC 7261 vs Core 7 160UL

AMD

EPYC 7261

8 Cores16 Thrd155 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core 7 160UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The EPYC 7261 is positioned at rank #592 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7261

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9340%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1764%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1567%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1210%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
99%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
99%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
98%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
97%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
97%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
97%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
96%
#362
EPYC 7532
MSRP: $2380|Avg: $225
96%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
100%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
100%
#605
Xeon E3-1270 v3
MSRP: $339|Avg: $410
96%
#607
Xeon E3-1235
MSRP: $240|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core 7 160UL (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7261Core 7 160UL
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($8)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-PS (2024) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7261 (2018) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7261Core 7 160UL
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($8)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7261 and Core 7 160UL

AMD

EPYC 7261

The EPYC 7261 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,149 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core 7 160UL

The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7261 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core 7 160UL offers 10 cores / 12 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7261 versus 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL — a 56.8% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The EPYC 7261 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 7 160UL uses Raptor Lake-PS (2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7261 scores 11,149 against the Core 7 160UL's 11,043 — a 1% lead for the EPYC 7261. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7261 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL.

FeatureEPYC 7261Core 7 160UL
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
10 / 12+25%
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
5.2 GHz+79%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+39%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+167%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
PassMark
11,149
11,043
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7261 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core 7 160UL uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7261Core 7 160UL
Socket
SP3
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%