
EPYC 7261

Xeon E5-4627 v3
EPYC 7261 vs Xeon E5-4627 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7261 vs Xeon E5-4627 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7261 vs Xeon E5-4627 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7261
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- β Costs $1,724 less on MSRP ($501 MSRP vs $2,225 MSRP).
- β Delivers 336.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 5.1 PassMark/$ ($501 MSRP vs $2,225 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (11,149 vs 11,344).
Xeon E5-4627 v3
2015Why buy it
- β +1.7% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 135W instead of 155W, a 20W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7261 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($2,225 MSRP vs $501 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7261 better than Xeon E5-4627 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7261 vs Xeon E5-4627 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7261
The EPYC 7261 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Naples (2017β2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,149 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-4627 v3
The Xeon E5-4627 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014β2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,344 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7261 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4627 v3 offers 10 cores / 10 threads β the Xeon E5-4627 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7261 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4627 v3 β a 9.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-4627 v3 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7261 uses the Naples (2017β2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4627 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014β2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7261 scores 11,149 against the Xeon E5-4627 v3's 11,344 β a 1.7% lead for the Xeon E5-4627 v3. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7261 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4627 v3.
| Feature | EPYC 7261 | Xeon E5-4627 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 10+25% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+28% | 25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Naples (2017β2018) | Haswell-EP (2014β2015) |
| PassMark | 11,149 | 11,344+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 970 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 6,500 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7261 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4627 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7261 | Xeon E5-4627 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 4 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 40 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7261) / Yes (Xeon E5-4627 v3).
| Feature | EPYC 7261 | Xeon E5-4627 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7261 was priced at $501, while the Xeon E5-4627 v3 came in at $2225. On launch pricing ($501 vs $2225), EPYC 7261 was $1724 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7261 delivers 22.3 pts/$ vs 5.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4627 v3 β making the EPYC 7261 the 125.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7261 | Xeon E5-4627 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $501-77% | $2225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3+337% | 5.1 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















