
Core i3-13100TE

EPYC 7261
Core i3-13100TE vs EPYC 7261 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-13100TE vs EPYC 7261 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-13100TE vs EPYC 7261: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-13100TE
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $364 less on MSRP ($137 MSRP vs $501 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 268.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.1 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($137 MSRP vs $501 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 155W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7261 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7261, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
EPYC 7261
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,149 vs 11,248).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 82.1 PassMark/$ ($501 MSRP vs $137 MSRP).
- ❌342.9% higher power demand at 155W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-13100TE better than EPYC 7261?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-13100TE vs EPYC 7261 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100TE
The Core i3-13100TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 11,248 points. Launch price was $149.

EPYC 7261
The EPYC 7261 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,149 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-13100TE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the EPYC 7261 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7261 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-13100TE versus 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7261 — a 34.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-13100TE (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-13100TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7261 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100TE scores 11,248 against the EPYC 7261's 11,149 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-13100TE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100TE vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7261.
| Feature | Core i3-13100TE | EPYC 7261 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+41% | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 11,248 | 11,149 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-13100TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7261 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-13100TE | EPYC 7261 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-13100TE was priced at $137, while the EPYC 7261 came in at $501. On launch pricing ($137 vs $501), Core i3-13100TE was $364 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-13100TE delivers 82.1 pts/$ vs 22.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 7261 — making the Core i3-13100TE the 114.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-13100TE | EPYC 7261 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $137-73% | $501 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.1+268% | 22.3 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















