Core i3-13100TE vs Xeon E5-1650 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-13100TE vs Xeon E5-1650 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-13100TE vs Xeon E5-1650 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-13100TE

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1650 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,248 vs 11,360).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-1650 v4, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $137 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1650 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-1650 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i3-13100TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1650 v4 better than Core i3-13100TE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1650 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-13100TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1650 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1650 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1650 v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i3-13100TE is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-1650 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $137 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-13100TE is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (82.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-13100TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-13100TE vs Xeon E5-1650 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-13100TE

The Core i3-13100TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 11,248 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-1650 v4

The Xeon E5-1650 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 11,360 points. Launch price was $617.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-13100TE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-1650 v4 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-1650 v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i3-13100TE versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-1650 v4 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-13100TE (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-13100TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-1650 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100TE scores 11,248 against the Xeon E5-1650 v4's 11,360 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-1650 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100TE vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1650 v4.

Feature	Core i3-13100TE	Xeon E5-1650 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+2%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	15 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	11,248	11,360

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-13100TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-1650 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.