
EPYC 7532

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
EPYC 7532 vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7532 vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7532 vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7532
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).
- ✅Costs $3,565 less on MSRP ($2,380 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 152.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.3 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($2,380 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (50,189 vs 50,726).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 21.3 PassMark/$ ($5,945 MSRP vs $2,380 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7532 better than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7532 vs Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7532
The EPYC 7532 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2020-02-19. It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 50,726 points. Launch price was $2,300.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7532 and Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7532 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7532 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7532 scores 50,726 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7532. L3 cache: 256 MB on the EPYC 7532 vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.
| Feature | EPYC 7532 | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB+327% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 50,726+1% | 50,189 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7532 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7532 versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7532) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the EPYC 7532 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7532) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).
| Feature | EPYC 7532 | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7532 rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.
| Feature | EPYC 7532 | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7532 was priced at $2380, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ came in at $5945. On launch pricing ($2380 vs $5945), EPYC 7532 was $3565 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7532 delivers 21.3 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — making the EPYC 7532 the 86.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7532 | Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2380-60% | $5945 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.3+154% | 8.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















