
EPYC 7643P vs EPYC 9374F

EPYC 7643P

EPYC 9374F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7643P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9374F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7643P | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,722) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,466) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7643P | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+20%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,722) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,466) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7643P and EPYC 9374F

EPYC 7643P
The EPYC 7643P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 77,307 points. Launch price was $2,722.

EPYC 9374F
The EPYC 9374F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,009 points. Launch price was $4,850.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7643P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the EPYC 9374F offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7643P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7643P versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9374F — a 17.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9374F (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.85 GHz). The EPYC 7643P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the EPYC 9374F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7643P scores 77,307 against the EPYC 9374F's 82,009 — a 5.9% lead for the EPYC 9374F. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 7643P | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+50% | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.85 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 77,307 | 82,009+6% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7643P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9374F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7643P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9374F — the EPYC 9374F supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9374F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7643P) vs 12 (EPYC 9374F). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7643P) and SP5 (EPYC 9374F).
| Feature | EPYC 7643P | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9374F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7643P) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9374F). Direct competitor: EPYC 7643P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; EPYC 9374F rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+.
| Feature | EPYC 7643P | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7643P launched at $2722 MSRP, while the EPYC 9374F debuted at $4850. At current prices ($2722 vs $3466), the EPYC 7643P is $744 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7643P delivers 28.4 pts/$ vs 23.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9374F — making the EPYC 7643P the 18.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7643P | EPYC 9374F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2722-44% | $4850 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2722-21% | $3466 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.4+20% | 23.7 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















