EPYC 9965
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
EPYC 9965 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9965 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9965 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9965
2024Why buy it
- ✅+368.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 192 cores / 384 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($14,813 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌316.7% higher power demand at 500W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.2% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $14,364 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $14,813 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 603.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 10.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $14,813 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 500W, a 380W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9965 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,293 vs 160,778).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 384 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9965, which brings 192 cores / 384 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9965 better than Ryzen 7 7800X3D?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9965 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9965
The EPYC 9965 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 192 cores and 384 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,778 points. Launch price was $14,813.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9965 packs 192 cores / 384 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9965 has 184 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9965 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 29.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.25 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 9965 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9965 scores 160,778 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 129.7% lead for the EPYC 9965. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,520 vs 2,700, a 55.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9965 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 192 / 384+2300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 4.4 GHz+96% |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+300% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 160,778+369% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,520 | 2,700+78% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9965 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9965 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the EPYC 9965 supports 15.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9965 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9965) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9965) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 9965 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9965) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+15% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9965) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9965 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9965 targets Data Center / High Density, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9965 rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Density | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9965 was priced at $14813, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($14813 vs $449), Ryzen 7 7800X3D was $14364 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9965 delivers 10.9 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 150.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $14813 | $449-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.9 | 76.4+601% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9965 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D
