EPYC 9965 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
EPYC 9965
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9965
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Why is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX better than EPYC 9965?
The matchup between the Zen 5 server giants, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX and EPYC 9965, reveal more than extreme power—it highlights the divide between high-frequency workstation muscle and uncompromised core density. The EPYC 9965 delivers a staggering 192 cores for world-record multi-threading, while the 9995WX leverages Zen 5 frequencies to master uncompromised productivity.
Technically, the EPYC 9965 wins on absolute hardware scale, featuring double the core count (192 vs 96) and a 12-channel memory architect designed for mission-critical server workloads. However, the Threadripper PRO 9995WX wins on absolute boost envelopes, reaching up to 5.4GHz for world-class performance in frequency-bound creative software. Moving between these two is a choice between uncompromised server-grade density and the ultimate stationary engine for high-end content creation in 2026.
The AMD EPYC 9965 is the ultimate winner for enterprise users who priority uncompromised core density and memory bandwidth for high-density server rigs. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is the ultimate winner for professional creators and researchers who need the best balance of multi-core muscle and uncompromised single-core speed. however, for any individual workstation node seeking the absolute pinnacle of Zen 5 interactive performance, the 96-core Threadripper is the superior choice.
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9965 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10,000) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($11,699) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Shimada Peak (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9965 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+7%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10,000) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($11,699) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9965 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
EPYC 9965
The EPYC 9965 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 192 cores and 384 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,778 points. Launch price was $14,813.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 176,281 points. Launch price was $11,700.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9965 packs 192 cores / 384 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9965 has 96 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9965 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9965 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9965 scores 160,778 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX's 176,281 — a 9.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,520 vs 3,000, a 65.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 384 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 192 / 384+100% | 96 / 192 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz+46% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 2.5 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total) | 384 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 160,778 | 176,281+10% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 180,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,520 | 3,000+97% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 30,170 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9965 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9965) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9965) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9965) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9965 targets Data Center / High Density, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX targets High-end Workstation / AI Rendering. Direct competitor: EPYC 9965 rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Density | High-end Workstation / AI Rendering |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9965 launched at $14813 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX debuted at $11699. At current prices ($10000 vs $11699), the EPYC 9965 is $1699 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9965 delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — making the EPYC 9965 the 6.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $14813 | $11699-21% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10000-15% | $11699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.1+7% | 15.1 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9965 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
