EPYC 9965 vs EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9965
EPYC 9575F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9965
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9575F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9965 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10,000) | ✅ More affordable ($9,238) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9965 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10,000) | ✅ More affordable ($9,238) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9965 and EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9965
The EPYC 9965 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 192 cores and 384 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 160,778 points. Launch price was $14,813.
EPYC 9575F
The EPYC 9575F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 147,718 points. Launch price was $11,791.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9965 packs 192 cores / 384 threads, while the EPYC 9575F offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 9965 has 128 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9965 versus 5 GHz on the EPYC 9575F — a 29.9% clock advantage for the EPYC 9575F (base: 2.25 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). Both are built on the Turin (2024) architecture using a 3 nm process. In PassMark, the EPYC 9965 scores 160,778 against the EPYC 9575F's 147,718 — a 8.5% lead for the EPYC 9965. L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9965 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9575F.
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 192 / 384+200% | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.25 GHz | 3.3 GHz+47% |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total)+50% | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 160,778+9% | 147,718 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,520 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 29,308 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the SP5 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Both feature 12-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9965) and SP5 (EPYC 9575F).
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-6000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12 | 12 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Both support AMD-V, SEV-SNP virtualization. Primary use case: EPYC 9965 targets Data Center / High Density, EPYC 9575F targets Data Center / High Frequency. Direct competitor: EPYC 9965 rivals Xeon 6980P; EPYC 9575F rivals Xeon 6952P.
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | AMD-V, SEV-SNP |
| Target Use | Data Center / High Density | Data Center / High Frequency |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9965 launched at $14813 MSRP, while the EPYC 9575F debuted at $11791. At current prices ($10000 vs $9238), the EPYC 9575F is $762 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9965 delivers 16.1 pts/$ vs 16.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 9575F — making the EPYC 9965 the 0.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9965 | EPYC 9575F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $14813 | $11791-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10000 | $9238-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.1 | 16.0 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9965 and EPYC 9575F
