Quadro FX 770M vs Radeon R7 A10-7700K
Quadro FX 770M
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 A10-7700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 770M is positioned at rank 284 and the Radeon R7 A10-7700K is on rank 475, so the Quadro FX 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 770M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A10-7700K
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is significantly newer (2023 vs 2008). The Radeon R7 A10-7700K likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 770M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 262.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 770M.
| Insight | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-262.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+262.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R7 A10-7700K remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 770M and Radeon R7 A10-7700K
Quadro FX 770M
The Quadro FX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 213 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Radeon R7 A10-7700K
The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 772 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 770M scores 213 versus the Radeon R7 A10-7700K's 772 — the Radeon R7 A10-7700K leads by 262.4%. The Quadro FX 770M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7 A10-7700K uses RDNA 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 770M) vs 2,048 (Radeon R7 A10-7700K). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 770M) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-7700K).
| Feature | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 213 | 772+262% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 2048+753% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 20.48 TFLOPS+3192% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 770M) vs 2 MB (Radeon R7 A10-7700K) — the Radeon R7 A10-7700K has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 770M draws 189W versus the Radeon R7 A10-7700K's 100W — a 61.6% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 770M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-7700K). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 100W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1 | 7.7+600% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A10-7700K is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 770M | Radeon R7 A10-7700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $152 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $118 |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 33 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #815 | #140 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 770M and Radeon R7 A10-7700K
