FX-8300
VS
Xeon E3-1225 v3

FX-8300 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3

AMD

FX-8300

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1225 v3

4 Cores4 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8300 is positioned at rank 639 and the Xeon E3-1225 v3 is on rank 575, so the Xeon E3-1225 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11515%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10881%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7900%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2380%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1885%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1649%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
945%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
932%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
849%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
849%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
839%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
817%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
805%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
802%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
795%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#638
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
100%
#640
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
100%
#641
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
100%
#644
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#645
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#646
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#647
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#648
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
98%
#649
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#650
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#651
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1225 v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
8743%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1651%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1467%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1133%
#348
Xeon Gold 6426Y
MSRP: $2145|Avg: N/A
99%
#349
EPYC 4565P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $1980
99%
#351
Xeon W-2295
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $1400
98%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
96%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
95%
#575
Xeon E3-1225 v3
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
100%
#577
Xeon E5-1620 v3
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
100%
#583
Xeon E3-1245 v2
MSRP: $273|Avg: $204
98%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($29) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1225 v3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightFX-8300Xeon E3-1225 v3
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($29)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-WS (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8300 ($50), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($21 less, 72% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightFX-8300Xeon E3-1225 v3
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+72%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($29)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8300 and Xeon E3-1225 v3

AMD

FX-8300

The FX-8300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,333 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E3-1225 v3

The Xeon E3-1225 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $384.

Processing Power

The FX-8300 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8300 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-8300 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the FX-8300 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The FX-8300 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8300 scores 5,333 against the Xeon E3-1225 v3's 5,324 — a 0.2% lead for the FX-8300.

FeatureFX-8300Xeon E3-1225 v3
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+17%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+3%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+3100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark
5,333
5,324
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,108
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,324
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8300 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-8300Xeon E3-1225 v3
Socket
AM3+
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (FX-8300) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1225 v3). The Xeon E3-1225 v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the FX-8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1225 v3 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E3-1225 v3 rivals Core i5-4570.

FeatureFX-8300Xeon E3-1225 v3
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics P4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-8300 launched at $197 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1225 v3 debuted at $224. At current prices ($50 vs $29), the Xeon E3-1225 v3 is $21 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8300 delivers 106.7 pts/$ vs 183.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1225 v3 — making the Xeon E3-1225 v3 the 53% better value option.

FeatureFX-8300Xeon E3-1225 v3
MSRP
$197-12%
$224
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$29-42%
Performance per Dollar
106.7
183.6+72%
Release Date
2012
2013