FX-8300 vs Xeon E3-1230L v3

FX-8300 vs Xeon E3-1230L v3 Performance Spectrum

FX-8300

8 / 8

5,333

+0.7%

Athlon X4 760K

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1230L v3

4 / 8

5,297

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8300 vs Xeon E3-1230L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8300 vs Xeon E3-1230L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8300

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $197 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1230L v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌280% higher power demand at 95W vs 25W.

Xeon E3-1230L v3

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 95W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,297 vs 5,333).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8300 better than Xeon E3-1230L v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1230L v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8300 is the better buy right now. FX-8300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $197 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1230L v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-8300 vs Xeon E3-1230L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8300

The FX-8300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,333 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1230L v3

The Xeon E3-1230L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,297 points. Launch price was $289.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8300 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1230L v3 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8300 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the FX-8300 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1230L v3 — a 40% clock advantage for the FX-8300 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The FX-8300 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1230L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8300 scores 5,333 against the Xeon E3-1230L v3's 5,297 — a 0.7% lead for the FX-8300.

Feature	FX-8300	Xeon E3-1230L v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+50%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+83%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+3100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	5,333	5,297

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8300 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1230L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.