FX-8370E
VS
Core i7-4700MQ

FX-8370E vs Core i7-4700MQ

AMD

FX-8370E

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i7-4700MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8370E is positioned at rank 646 and the Core i7-4700MQ is on rank 1000, so the FX-8370E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8370E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11653%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11011%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7995%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2408%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1908%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1669%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
956%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
943%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
859%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
859%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
849%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
826%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
815%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
812%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
804%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
98%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
100%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
100%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
99%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
99%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
99%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
99%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
98%
#659
Core i5-6600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $35
98%
#660
FX-4350
MSRP: $122|Avg: $140
98%
#661
Core i5-3570T
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4700MQ

#988
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2100%
#989
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2069%
#990
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1900%
#991
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1891%
#992
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1874%
#994
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1810%
#995
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1735%
#996
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1732%
#997
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1686%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
98%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
97%
#1010
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
96%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
95%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
95%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The FX-8370E leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-4700MQ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightFX-8370ECore i7-4700MQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
More affordable ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i7-4700MQ stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 38% cheaper ($50 vs $80) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightFX-8370ECore i7-4700MQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+61%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8370E and Core i7-4700MQ

AMD

FX-8370E

The FX-8370E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,324 points. Launch price was $199.

Intel

Core i7-4700MQ

The Core i7-4700MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,349 points. Launch price was $288.

Processing Power

The FX-8370E packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-4700MQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8370E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370E versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-4700MQ — a 23.4% clock advantage for the FX-8370E (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The FX-8370E uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8370E scores 5,324 against the Core i7-4700MQ's 5,349 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-4700MQ.

FeatureFX-8370ECore i7-4700MQ
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+26%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+38%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+3100%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
5,324
5,349
Geekbench 6 Single
512
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,878
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8370E uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-4700MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureFX-8370ECore i7-4700MQ
Socket
AM3+
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (FX-8370E) / not specified (Core i7-4700MQ).

FeatureFX-8370ECore i7-4700MQ
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-8370E launched at $199 MSRP, while the Core i7-4700MQ debuted at $383. At current prices ($80 vs $50), the Core i7-4700MQ is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8370E delivers 66.5 pts/$ vs 107.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-4700MQ — making the Core i7-4700MQ the 46.6% better value option.

FeatureFX-8370ECore i7-4700MQ
MSRP
$199-48%
$383
Avg Price (30d)
$80
$50-38%
Performance per Dollar
66.5
107.0+61%
Release Date
2014
2013