
GeForce 710A
Popular choices:

FirePro M2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 710A is positioned at rank 335 and the FirePro M2000 is on rank 323, so the FirePro M2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 710A
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 710A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M2000.
| Insight | GeForce 710A | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $62), it costs 19% less, resulting in a 22% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 710A | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($62) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 710A and FirePro M2000

GeForce 710A
The GeForce 710A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 433 points.

FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 710A scores 433 and the FirePro M2000 reaches 426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 710A is built on Maxwell while the FirePro M2000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 710A) vs 640 (FirePro M2000). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 710A) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000).
| Feature | GeForce 710A | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 433+2% | 426 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+42% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 710A | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 710A comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M2000 has 1 GB. The GeForce 710A offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 710A) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro M2000) — the GeForce 710A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 710A | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce 710A) vs 11.1 (FirePro M2000). Vulkan: 1.0 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce 710A | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+8% | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+10% | 4.2 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 6+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (GeForce 710A) vs UVD 3 (FirePro M2000). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 710A) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000).
| Feature | GeForce 710A | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | NVDEC | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 710A draws 33W versus the FirePro M2000's 43W — a 26.3% difference. The GeForce 710A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 710A) vs 350W (FirePro M2000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 710A | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-23% | 43W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1+32% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 710A launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $62, while the FirePro M2000 launched at $300 and now averages $50. The FirePro M2000 costs 19.4% less ($12 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.0 (GeForce 710A) vs 8.5 (FirePro M2000) — the FirePro M2000 offers 21.4% better value. The GeForce 710A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 710A | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-88% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $62 | $50-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 8.5+21% |
| Codename | GM108 | Heathrow |
| Release | March 13 2015 | July 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #810 | #710 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













