CPU
GPU
GeForce 710A
Popular choices:
Radeon R5 M230
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 710A is positioned at rank 335 and the Radeon R5 M230 is on rank 468, so the GeForce 710A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 710A
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M230
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 710A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 M230 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 710A | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 M230 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 M230 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $62), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 143.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 710A | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+143.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($62) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 710A and Radeon R5 M230
GeForce 710A
The GeForce 710A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 433 points.
Radeon R5 M230
The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 710A scores 433 and the Radeon R5 M230 reaches 425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 710A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 M230 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 710A) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230).
| Feature | GeForce 710A | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 433+2% | 425 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 710A | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 710A comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M230 has 4 GB. The Radeon R5 M230 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 710A | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 710A draws 33W versus the Radeon R5 M230's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 710A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 710A) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M230). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce 710A | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1+130% | 5.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 710A launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $62, while the Radeon R5 M230 launched at $80 and now averages $25. The Radeon R5 M230 costs 59.7% less ($37 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.0 (GeForce 710A) vs 17.0 (Radeon R5 M230) — the Radeon R5 M230 offers 142.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce 710A | Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-56% | $80 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $62 | $25-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.0 | 17.0+143% |
| Codename | GM108 | Pitcairn |
| Release | March 13 2015 | June 9 2015 |
| Ranking | #810 | #522 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 710A and Radeon R5 M230
