GeForce 710A vs Radeon R5 M230

NVIDIA

GeForce 710A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M230

2015
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 710A vs Radeon R5 M230 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 710A vs Radeon R5 M230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 710A vs Radeon R5 M230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 710A

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $45 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • Delivers 132.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 M230

2015

Why buy it

  • 15.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN (2012−2015) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 128.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $80 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
  • 127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R5 M230 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 710A instead at 433 vs 425, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 710A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 710A makes the most sense to buy today. It is $45 cheaper on MSRP at $35 vs $80, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 132.9% (12.4 vs 5.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 M230 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 710A vs Radeon R5 M230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 710A

The GeForce 710A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 433 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M230

The Radeon R5 M230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 425 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 710A scores 433 and the Radeon R5 M230 reaches 425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 710A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 M230 uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 710A) vs 1,024 (Radeon R5 M230).

FeatureGeForce 710ARadeon R5 M230
G3D Mark Score
433+2%
425
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1024+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 710A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M230 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 710ARadeon R5 M230
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 710A has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M230 carries 4 GB. Radeon R5 M230 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 710A and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M230.

FeatureGeForce 710ARadeon R5 M230
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 710A draws 33W versus the Radeon R5 M230's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 710A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 710A) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M230). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce 710ARadeon R5 M230
TDP
33W-56%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
13.1+130%
5.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 710A came in at $35, while the Radeon R5 M230 launched at $80. On MSRP, GeForce 710A was 56.3% cheaper ($45 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (GeForce 710A) vs 5.3 (Radeon R5 M230) — the GeForce 710A offers 134% better value.

FeatureGeForce 710ARadeon R5 M230
MSRP
$35-56%
$80
Performance per Dollar
12.4+134%
5.3
Codename
GM108
Pitcairn
Release
March 13 2015
June 9 2015
Ranking
#810
#522

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.