
GeForce 710M

GeForce GT 420
GeForce 710M vs GeForce GT 420 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 710M vs GeForce GT 420 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 710M vs GeForce GT 420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 710M
2015Why buy it
- ✅35.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 64W, a 31W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
GeForce GT 420
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 710M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌93.9% higher power demand at 64W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 710M vs GeForce GT 420 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 710M
The GeForce 710M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 448 points.

GeForce GT 420
The GeForce GT 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 710M scores 448 and the GeForce GT 420 reaches 432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 710M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 420 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 710M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 420). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 710M) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 420).
| Feature | GeForce 710M | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 448+4% | 432 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+18% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 710M | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 710M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 420 carries 1 GB. GeForce 710M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 710M and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 420. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 710M) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 420) — the GeForce 710M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 710M | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 710M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 420). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 710M | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 710M) vs None (GeForce GT 420). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 710M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 420).
| Feature | GeForce 710M | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 710M draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 420's 64W — a 63.9% difference. The GeForce 710M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 710M) vs 250W (GeForce GT 420). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce 710M | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-48% | 64W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 13.6+100% | 6.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 710M (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 710M | GeForce GT 420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $79 |
| Codename | GM108 | GK107 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #847 | #777 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














