GeForce 730A vs GeForce RTX 4070

NVIDIA

GeForce 730A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce 730A vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 730A vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 730A vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 730A

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $539 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 200W, a 167W reduction.
  • Measures 145mm instead of 304mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.7 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • 1470.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 252.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 12.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 506.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 33W.
  • 109.7% longer card at 304mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1470.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3423.4% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 764), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce 730A is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $539 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $60, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 252.9% (44.9 vs 12.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 730A vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 730A

The GeForce 730A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 764 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 730A scores 764 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 3423.4%. The GeForce 730A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 730A) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 730A) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 730AGeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score
764
26,919+3423%
Architecture
Maxwell
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
384
5888+1433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
29.15 TFLOPS+3933%
Boost Clock
941 MHz
2475 MHz+163%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
184+667%
L1 Cache
0.19 MB
5.8 MB+2953%
L2 Cache
1 MB
36 MB+3500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce 730A does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 730A is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce 730AGeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 730A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 730A and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 730A) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 730AGeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
12 GB+2300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
504 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
36 MB+3500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 730A) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce 730AGeForce RTX 4070
DirectX
11.0
12.2+11%
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1 (GeForce 730A) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 730A) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

FeatureGeForce 730AGeForce RTX 4070
Encoder
NVENC 1
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 730A draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 730A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 730A) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce 730AGeForce RTX 4070
TDP
33W-84%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-46%
650W
Power Connector
Legacy
8-pin
Length
145mm
304mm
Height
69mm
137mm
Slots
1-67%
3
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
23.2
134.6+480%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 730A came in at $60, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce 730A was 90% cheaper ($539 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.7 (GeForce 730A) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 253.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 730AGeForce RTX 4070
MSRP
$60-90%
$599
Performance per Dollar
12.7
44.9+254%
Codename
GM108
AD104
Release
March 13 2015
April 12 2023
Ranking
#810
#32

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.