GeForce 730A vs Quadro K1000M

NVIDIA

GeForce 730A

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K1000M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 730A vs Quadro K1000M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 730A vs Quadro K1000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 730A vs Quadro K1000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 730A

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 100W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K1000M across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K1000M

2013

Why buy it

  • 29.3% more average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
  • 203% higher power demand at 100W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K1000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 29.3% in average FPS across 40 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 730A instead at 764 vs 756, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 730A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 730A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K1000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 730A vs Quadro K1000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 730A

The GeForce 730A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 764 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K1000M

The Quadro K1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 756 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 730A scores 764 and the Quadro K1000M reaches 756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 730A is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K1000M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 730A) vs 1,536 (Quadro K1000M). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 730A) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K1000M).

FeatureGeForce 730AQuadro K1000M
G3D Mark Score
764+1%
756
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
2.369 TFLOPS+228%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
128+433%
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 730A gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K1000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 730AQuadro K1000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 730A has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1000M carries 2 GB. Quadro K1000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 730A and 64-bit on the Quadro K1000M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 730A) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K1000M) — the GeForce 730A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 730AQuadro K1000M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 730A draws 33W versus the Quadro K1000M's 100W — a 100.8% difference. The GeForce 730A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 730A) vs 350W (Quadro K1000M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 730AQuadro K1000M
TDP
33W-67%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
23.2+205%
7.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 730A (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 730AQuadro K1000M
MSRP
$60
Codename
GM108
GK104
Release
March 13 2015
July 23 2013
Ranking
#810
#562

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.