GeForce 800A vs Quadro 410
GeForce 800A
Popular choices:
Quadro 410
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 800A is positioned at rank 504 and the Quadro 410 is on rank 251, so the Quadro 410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 800A
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 800A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 410.
| Insight | GeForce 800A | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 410 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 410 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $30), it costs 17% less, resulting in a 17.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 800A | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+17.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 800A and Quadro 410
GeForce 800A
The GeForce 800A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 435 points.
Quadro 410
The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 800A scores 435 and the Quadro 410 reaches 427 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 800A is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 410 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 800A) vs 1,152 (Quadro 410). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 800A) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410).
| Feature | GeForce 800A | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 435+2% | 427 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1152+350% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 1.627 TFLOPS+176% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 96+500% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 800A | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 800A) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 410) — the GeForce 800A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 800A | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 800A draws 33W versus the Quadro 410's 100W — a 100.8% difference. The GeForce 800A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 800A) vs 350W (Quadro 410). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 800A | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-67% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.2+207% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 800A launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Quadro 410 launched at $149 and now averages $25. The Quadro 410 costs 16.7% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.5 (GeForce 800A) vs 17.1 (Quadro 410) — the Quadro 410 offers 17.9% better value. The GeForce 800A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 800A | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $25-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.5 | 17.1+18% |
| Codename | GM108 | GK104 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #832 | #604 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 800A and Quadro 410
