GeForce 9300 GS vs Radeon 3000

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300 GS

2015Core: 928 MHzBoost: 941 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 3000

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9300 GS vs Radeon 3000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9300 GS vs Radeon 3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9300 GS vs Radeon 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9300 GS

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 16900% longer card at 170mm vs 1mm.

Radeon 3000

2019

Why buy it

  • 1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • GeForce 9300 GS is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 170mm, a 169mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9300 GS instead at 102 vs 98, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 3000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 3000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 9300 GS vs Radeon 3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9300 GS

The GeForce 9300 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points.

AMD

Radeon 3000

The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9300 GS scores 102 and the Radeon 3000 reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300 GS is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300 GS) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 0.7227 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300 GS) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000). Boost clocks: 941 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9300 GSRadeon 3000
G3D Mark Score
102+4%
98
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7227 TFLOPS
1.247 TFLOPS+73%
Boost Clock
941 MHz
1218 MHz+29%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9300 GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 3000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9300 GSRadeon 3000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9300 GS has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3000 carries 512 MB. Radeon 3000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9300 GS and 64-bit on the Radeon 3000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9300 GS) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3000) — the GeForce 9300 GS has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9300 GSRadeon 3000
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9300 GS) vs 10_0 (Radeon 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9300 GSRadeon 3000
DirectX
10.0
10_0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9300 GS) vs Avivo HD (Radeon 3000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs Avivo HD.

FeatureGeForce 9300 GSRadeon 3000
Encoder
No
Avivo HD
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
Avivo HD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9300 GS draws 33W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 9300 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300 GS) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce 9300 GSRadeon 3000
TDP
33W-34%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
1mm
Height
106mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
3.1+55%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9300 GS came in at $0, while the Radeon 3000 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 9300 GS) vs Infinity (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon 3000 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 3000 (2019 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 9300 GSRadeon 3000
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
GM108
Polaris 23
Release
March 13 2015
May 13 2019
Ranking
#810
#757

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.