
GeForce 9450

Quadro FX Go1400
GeForce 9450 vs Quadro FX Go1400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9450 vs Quadro FX Go1400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9450 vs Quadro FX Go1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9450
2015Why buy it
- β 1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro FX Go1400
2008Why buy it
- β 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than GeForce 9450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9450 vs Quadro FX Go1400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9450
The GeForce 9450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 27 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points.

Quadro FX Go1400
The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9450 scores 105 and the Quadro FX Go1400 reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9450 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX Go1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce 9450) vs 192 (Quadro FX Go1400). Raw compute: 1.306 TFLOPS (GeForce 9450) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400).
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 105+3% | 102 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+233% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.306 TFLOPS+183% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+953% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX Go1400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9450 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX Go1400 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX Go1400 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9450 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX Go1400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce 9450) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX Go1400) β the GeForce 9450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+953% | 0.19 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9450 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX Go1400's 150W β a 66.7% difference. The GeForce 9450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9450) vs 350W (Quadro FX Go1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-50% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+100% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 9450 (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9450 | Quadro FX Go1400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | β |
| Codename | GM107 | GT200B |
| Release | October 27 2015 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #671 | #884 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














