
GeForce 9500 GT

Radeon HD 6230
GeForce 9500 GT vs Radeon HD 6230 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9500 GT vs Radeon HD 6230 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9500 GT vs Radeon HD 6230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9500 GT
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 186W, a 36W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌98% HIGHER MSRP$99 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.9 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6230
2011Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 88.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 175mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌24% higher power demand at 186W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9500 GT vs Radeon HD 6230 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9500 GT
The GeForce 9500 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 188 points.

Radeon HD 6230
The Radeon HD 6230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9500 GT scores 188 versus the Radeon HD 6230's 179 — the GeForce 9500 GT leads by 5%. The GeForce 9500 GT is built on G9x while the Radeon HD 6230 uses TeraScale 3, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9500 GT) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6230).
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GT | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 188+5% | 179 |
| Architecture | G9x | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 1280+471% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9500 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6230 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GT | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9500 GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6230 carries 512 MB. GeForce 9500 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9500 GT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6230.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GT | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9500 GT) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6230). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GT | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.2+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 9500 GT) vs UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 6230). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 2.2.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GT | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 2.2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9500 GT draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6230's 186W — a 21.4% difference. The GeForce 9500 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9500 GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6230). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 175mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GT | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-19% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 175mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9500 GT came in at $99, while the Radeon HD 6230 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6230 was 49.5% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (GeForce 9500 GT) vs 3.6 (Radeon HD 6230) — the Radeon HD 6230 offers 89.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6230 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9500 GT | Radeon HD 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $50-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 3.6+89% |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | Cayman |
| Release | July 15 2008 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #825 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














