GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce 825M
GeForce 9800 GTX
Popular choices:
GeForce 825M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9800 GTX is positioned at rank 610 and the GeForce 825M is on rank 119, so the GeForce 825M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800 GTX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 825M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 825M is significantly newer (2015 vs 2008). The GeForce 825M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800 GTX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9800 GTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 825M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9800 GTX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9800 GTX holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce 825M
GeForce 9800 GTX
The GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 769 points.
GeForce 825M
The GeForce 825M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 26 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1071 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 761 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9800 GTX scores 769 and the GeForce 825M reaches 761 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800 GTX is built on G9x while the GeForce 825M uses Maxwell, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800 GTX) vs 384 (GeForce 825M).
| Feature | GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 769+1% | 761 |
| Architecture | G9x | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 224 | 384+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9800 GTX comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 825M has 2 GB. The GeForce 825M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800 GTX) vs 11.0 (GeForce 825M). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.0+10% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800 GTX) vs NVENC 1 (GeForce 825M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9800 GTX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 825M).
| Feature | GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9800 GTX draws 150W versus the GeForce 825M's 33W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 825M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800 GTX) vs 350W (GeForce 825M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 100°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 33W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 100°C | 75°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 5.1 | 23.1+353% |
Value Analysis
Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.6 (GeForce 9800 GTX) vs 25.4 (GeForce 825M) — the GeForce 9800 GTX offers 0.8% better value. The GeForce 825M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce 825M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.6 | 25.4 |
| Codename | NB9E-GTX | GM108 |
| Release | July 15 2008 | August 26 2015 |
| Ranking | #825 | #768 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce 825M
