G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200SE

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅8724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 52372.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8724.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 89475% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 12), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 52372.9% (63.6 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200SE

The GeForce FX 5200SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12 points. Launch price was $89.99.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200SE scores 12 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 89475%. The GeForce FX 5200SE is built on Rankine while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce FX 5200SE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	12	10,749+89475%
Architecture	Rankine	Ampere
Process Node	40 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	288	2304+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8479 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS+699%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	48	72+50%
L1 Cache	0.38 MB	2.3 MB+505%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	2 MB+426%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce FX 5200SE is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200SE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5200SE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200SE and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200SE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	6 GB+1100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	168 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+33%	96-bit
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	2 MB+426%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200SE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	9.0a	12 Ultimate+33%
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
OpenGL	1.5	4.6+207%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: None vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce FX 5200SE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	None	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	None	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200SE draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200SE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP	150W	70W-53%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	168mm	160mm
Height	100mm	—
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	70-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	0.1	153.6+153500%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200SE came in at $99, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200SE was 41.4% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 63500% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce FX 5200SE	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP	$99-41%	$169
Performance per Dollar	0.1	63.6+63500%
Codename	GF114	GA107
Release	February 20 2012	February 2 2024
Ranking	#706	#252

Search GeForce FX 5200SE on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.