
GeForce FX 5200SE

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5200SE
2012Why buy it
- ✅+100% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌368.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 32W.
GeForce4 440 Go 64M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 32W instead of 150W, a 118W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 12).
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200SE
The GeForce FX 5200SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12 points. Launch price was $89.99.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200SE scores 12 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce FX 5200SE leads by 100%. The GeForce FX 5200SE is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12+100% | 6 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 384+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8479 TFLOPS+56% | 0.5445 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+1100% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200SE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 256 KB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) — the GeForce FX 5200SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a+29% | 7.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 VPE. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | None | MPEG-2 VPE |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200SE draws 150W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 440 Go 64M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 32W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 100mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.2+100% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












