GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200SE

2012Core: 736 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012Core: Up to 710 MHz

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200SE

2012

Why buy it

  • +100% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 368.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 32W.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 32W instead of 150W, a 118W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 12).
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5200SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 100% in PassMark G3D (12 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5200SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 440 Go 64M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200SE

The GeForce FX 5200SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12 points. Launch price was $89.99.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200SE scores 12 versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 6 — the GeForce FX 5200SE leads by 100%. The GeForce FX 5200SE is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 440 Go 64M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
G3D Mark Score
12+100%
6
Architecture
Rankine
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
288
384+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8479 TFLOPS+56%
0.5445 TFLOPS
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
384 KB+1100%
32 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200SE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 440 Go 64M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 256 KB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) — the GeForce FX 5200SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
DirectX
9.0a+29%
7.0
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
1.5
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Decoder: None vs MPEG-2 VPE. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
None
MPEG-2 VPE
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200SE draws 150W versus the GeForce4 440 Go 64M's 32W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 440 Go 64M
TDP
150W
32W-79%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
100mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70-18%
85
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.2+100%