Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4200

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200SE

2012Core: 736 MHz
Similar parts
·····
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4200

2022Core: 2235 MHzBoost: 2520 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Performance Spectrum

GeForce FX 5200SE
0.5 GB 150
12
+100.0%
brand logoGeForce PCX 5300
brand logoGeForce FX Go 5200
brand logoGeForce FX 5200
brand logoGeForce FX 5600XT
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce4 Ti 4200
0.5 GB 450
6
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 6200A
brand logoGeForce 256
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce FX 5200SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 Ti 4200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce FX 5200SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 Ti 4200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce FX 5200SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 Ti 4200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce FX 5200SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 Ti 4200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce FX 5200SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 Ti 4200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce FX 5200SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 Ti 4200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce FX 5200SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 Ti 4200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce FX 5200SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 Ti 4200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce FX 5200SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 Ti 4200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Civilization VI

Civilization VI

1080P
GeForce FX 5200SE
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce4 Ti 4200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200SE

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅+100% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 302% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 150W instead of 450W, a 300W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 168mm instead of 175mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce4 Ti 4200

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 12).
  • ❌
    101% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • ❌200% higher power demand at 450W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5200SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 100% in PassMark G3D (12 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce4 Ti 4200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 128 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 302% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce FX 5200SE is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce4 Ti 4200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200SE

The GeForce FX 5200SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12 points. Launch price was $89.99.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4200

The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200SE scores 12 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 6 — the GeForce FX 5200SE leads by 100%. The GeForce FX 5200SE is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4200).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4200
G3D Mark Score
12+100%
6
Architecture
Rankine
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
40 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
288
16384+5589%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8479 TFLOPS
82.58 TFLOPS+9639%
ROPs
24
176+633%
TMUs
48
512+967%
L1 Cache
0.38 MB
16 MB+4111%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
72 MB+18847%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200SE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4200. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce4 Ti 4200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4200
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
72 MB+18847%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4200
DirectX
9.0a+11%
8.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
1.5
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Decoder: None vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4200).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4200
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
None
None
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200SE draws 150W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 450W — a 100% difference. The GeForce FX 5200SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4200
TDP
150W-67%
450W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
175mm
Height
100mm
100mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
70
65-7%
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200SE came in at $99, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200SE was 50.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce FX 5200SE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce4 Ti 4200 (2022 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP
$99-50%
$199
Performance per Dollar
0.1
0.0
Codename
GF114
AD102
Release
February 20 2012
September 20 2022
Ranking
#706
#4
Search GeForce FX 5200SE on AmazonSearch GeForce4 Ti 4200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.