GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4600

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200SE

2012Core: 736 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4600

2010Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200SE

2012

Why buy it

  • +100% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 706.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Measures 168mm instead of 216mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce4 Ti 4600

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 12).
  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 303% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5200SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 100% in PassMark G3D (12 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5200SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 706.1% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200SE

The GeForce FX 5200SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12 points. Launch price was $89.99.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 Ti 4600

The GeForce4 Ti 4600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200SE scores 12 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 6 — the GeForce FX 5200SE leads by 100%. The GeForce FX 5200SE is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 288 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 336 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4600).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4600
G3D Mark Score
12+100%
6
Architecture
Rankine
Fermi
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
288
336+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8479 TFLOPS
0.9072 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
48
56+17%
L1 Cache
384 KB
448 KB+17%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5200SE has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 carries 128 MB. GeForce FX 5200SE gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200SE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4600. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 512 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce4 Ti 4600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4600
DirectX
9.0a+11%
8.1
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
1.5+15%
1.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Decoder: None vs No.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4600
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
None
No
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200SE draws 150W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4600's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce FX 5200SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4600
TDP
150W-6%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
216mm
Height
100mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
70
65°C-7%
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200SE came in at $99, while the GeForce4 Ti 4600 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200SE was 75.2% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4600) — the GeForce FX 5200SE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200SE (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200SEGeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP
$99-75%
$399
Performance per Dollar
0.1
0.0
Codename
GF114
GF104
Release
February 20 2012
July 12 2010
Ranking
#706
#652

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.